As the team appears ready to capitalize on its financial flexibility, it appears that few teams have the cap space that the Columbus Blue Jackets do. The Blue Jackets are considering a variety of options regarding how to best use their cap space as the season has begun. Accepting "bad" contracts from other teams is a sensible option, provided that the deals include alluring asset sweeteners like draft picks or young players. Columbus will be able to help a team in need with its cap situation while also acquiring valuable assets for the future.
According to Seravalli, the problem is that a lot of the contracts other teams wish to sign have three- to five-year commitments. He has been adamant up to this point that he won't be signing players to such long-term contracts, and it is thought that the team will be ready to contend for the playoffs in the upcoming seasons. When the team is a little closer to contending, it will only be detrimental to tie up cap space in possible liabilities. Contracts with significant remaining terms are therefore most likely doomed to fail with Columbus.
Columbus is only interested in agreements with shorter-term commitments, so rival teams trying to get rid of their troublesome contracts should be aware of this. Deals with one or two years left could become alluring, particularly if additional assets are included to possibly support the Blue Jackets' rebuild even more. However, Columbus wants to keep cap space for future moves as this team develops, so long-term deals are just not feasible.